Save old buildings? h45

Save old buildings? h45

Save old buildings?

Introduction

In this lesson you are going to read about old buildings.
Some people think that we should preserve them.

What do you think?
Discuss the following question in your group:

  • Is it important that we have these reminders of the past around us every day?

This lesson contains 5 steps and an evaluation.
Work them through step by step.


 

Step

Activity

 

 

Introduction

Find out what you already know.

Step 1

Speaking

Ask and answer questions with a classmate about buildings in your hometown.

Step 2

Reading

Write down six reasons of your own to save buildings. Watch a slideshow. Match headings with a text. Another exercise, choosing correct answer.

Step 3

Grammar

About adverbs and adjectives. Do an exercise and study Grammar Desk.

Step 4

Writing

Write five sentences with adverbs. Your classmate rewrite these with adjectives. Talk about the sentences.

Step 5

Task

Write a discursive essay about a topic.

 

Evaluation

Reflecting on what you have learned.

 

Difficult words? Search these on Cambridge Dictionaries

 

Step 1 - Speaking

Speaking
Ask and answer these questions with your classmate.
Think of the situation where you both live when you answer these questions.

  1. How old (approximately) are the oldest buildings?
    • older than 14th century
    • 14th century
    • 16th century
    • 18th century
  1. Which is the oldest building in your nearest town?
    • church
    • government building
    • private residence
    • other
  1. What is the condition of this building?
    • It’s falling down.
    • It’s recently been renovated.
    • It’s in really good condition.
  1. What is your opinion about old buildings?
    • They need to be preserved. It’s a link to the past.
    • They should be knocked down to make room for modern buildings.
    • Not sure but they cost a lot of money to preserve, don’t they?
    • We could keep some of them – do we really need all of them?

Step 2 - Reading

Reading
You are going to read an article entitled ‘Six practical reasons to save old buildings’.
The paragraph heading has been removed.

Paragraph headings:

  1. New businesses prefer old buildings.
  2. Old buildings are reminders of a city’s culture and complexity.
  3. Old buildings attract people.
  4. Old buildings have intrinsic value.
  5. Regret only goes one way.
  6. When you tear down an old building, you never know what’s being destroyed.

Read the text.

Nine Practical Reasons to Save Old Buildings

What is historic, and worth saving, varies with the beholder, but some definition is urgent. Simply put, “historic” means “old and worth the trouble.” It applies to a building that’s part of a community’s tangible past. And though it may surprise cynics, old buildings can offer opportunities for a community’s future. This article examines both the cultural and practical values of old buildings and looks at why preserving them is beneficial not only for a community’s culture, but also for its local economy.

[1] Buildings of a certain era, namely pre-World War II, tend to be built with higher-quality materials such as rare hardwoods (especially heart pine) and wood from old-growth forests that no longer exist. Prewar buildings were also built by different standards.
A century-old building might be a better long-term bet than its brand-new counterparts. Take, for example, the antebellum Kennedy-Baker-Walker-Sherrill House in West Knoxville, Tennessee. Until the City Council approved a zoning deal, the house was threatened by developers’ interests. However, following its classification as a historic site, the house―and its five-brick-thick walls―will be reborn as an office building that could withstand the fiercest of tornadoes.

[2] A decade ago, the Daylight Building in Knoxville was a vacant eyesore. A developer purchased the property with plans to demolish the building to make way for new construction. However, following multiple failed deals to
demolish the building, the Daylight went back on the market. Dewhirst Properties bought it and began renovations only to discover the building’s hidden gems: drop-ceilings made with heart-pine wood, a large clerestory, a front awning adorned with unusual tinted “opalescent” glass, and a facade lined with bright copper. Beyond surviving demolition and revealing a treasure trove of details, the Daylight reminds us that even eyesores can be valuable for a community’s future.

[3] In 1961, urban activist Jane Jacobs startled city planners with The Death and Life of Great American Cities, in which Jacobs discussed economic advantages that certain types of businesses have when located in older buildings. Jacobs asserted that new buildings make sense for major chain stores, but other businesses–-such as bookstores, ethnic restaurants, antique stores, neighborhood pubs, and especially small start-ups―thrive in old buildings. small start-ups―thrive in old buildings. “As for really new ideas of any kind―no matter how ultimately profitable or otherwise successful some of them might prove to be―there is no leeway for such chancy trial, error, and experimentation in the high-overhead economy of new construction,” she wrote. “Old ideas can sometimes use new buildings. New ideas must use old buildings.” Jane Jacobs' book "The Death and Life of Great American Cities" changed the way people saw older buildings.

[4] Is it the warmth of the materials, the heart pine, marble, or old brick―or the resonance of other people, other activities? Maybe older buildings are just more interesting. The different levels, the vestiges of other uses, the awkward corners, the mixtures of styles, they’re at least something to talk about. America’s downtown revivals suggest that people like old buildings. Whether the feeling is patriotic, homey, warm, or reassuring, older architecture tends to fit the bill. Regardless of how they actually spend their lives, Americans prefer to picture themselves living around old buildings. Some eyes glaze over when preservationists talk about "historic building stock," but what they really mean is a community's inventory of old buildings ready to fulfill new uses.

[5] By seeing historic buildings―whether related to something famous or recognizably dramatic―tourists and long-time residents are able to witness the aesthetic and cultural history of an area. Just as banks prefer to build stately, old-fashioned facades, even when located in commercial malls, a city needs old buildings to maintain a sense of permanency and heritage.

[6] The preservation of historic buildings is a one-way street. There is no chance to renovate or to save a historic site once it’s gone. And we can never be certain what will be valued in the future. This reality brings to light the importance of locating and saving buildings of historic significance―because once a piece of history is destroyed, it is lost forever.

This toolkit originally appeared on March 3, 2014, and was adapted from Jack Neely’s article, “Nine Practical
Reasons to Save Old Buildings,” at Metro Pulse.


Do the exercises.

 

Step 3 - Grammar

Grammar
Let’s look at adjectives and adverbs.

An adjective describes a noun. It comes before the noun.

  • It’s a beautiful building.


An adverb describes the verb, adjective, or another adverb.

  • They built that house quickly.
  • The house was really old.
  • The windows were removed reasonably easily.

Some words can be used as both adjectives and adverbs.

  • The builder works well. (describes how he works = adverb)
  • You look well. (describes how you look = adjective)

Do the exercise.

Step 4 - Writing

Writing: Adverb - Adjective swap
Write out five sentences with adverbs.

For instance:

  1. The boy happily agreed.
  2.  
  3.  
  4.  
  5.  

Then give your sentences to your partner to write out with the adjectives.
You write out the sentences of your partner with the adjectives. 

For instance:

  1. The happy boy agreed.
  2.  
  3.  
  4.  
  5.  


Talk about your sentences. Do they mean the same?
How are they different in meaning?

In the example, the sentences don’t mean the same.  
The ‘happiness’ is with the agreement in the first sentence and with the boy in the second.

Step 5 - Task

Task: Writing
You are going to write a discursive essay.

The goal of a discursive essay is to present a balanced and objective examination of a subject. Like an argumentative essay, the topic may be controversial, but the discursive essay attempts to present a much more balanced discussion of the issue. It does not, however, have to be expressly neutral. The essay should present both sides of the discussion, supported by facts and research. The author may draw tentative conclusions about the subject and suggest them to the reader.

This is the topic:
Some people say that old buildings should be pulled down to make way for new buildings. Do you agree?

Write about:

  1. The importance of old buildings
  2. The need for new buildings
  3. Your own ideas.

Write an essay using all the notes and giving reasons for your point of view.

Evaluation

Copy and fill in the schedule and answer the questions below.

 

Activity

 

Needs improvement

​Satisfactory, good

Excellent  

Step 1
speaking

I can answer questions about buildings in my hometown.

 

 

 

Step 2 reading

I can match headings with a text about reasons to save old buildings.

 

 

 

Step 3 grammar

I can understand and use the grammar adverbs and adjectives.

 

 

 

Step 4 writing

I can write out sentences with adverbs and adjectives.

 

 

 

Step 5 Task

I can write a discursive essay about the question should old buildings be pulled down?

     


What have you learned in this lesson?
Answer the following questions:

  • What was the easiest part of this lesson?
  • What was the most interesting part?
  • What was the most difficult part?
  • What was new to you in this lesson?
  • What do you have to ask your teacher?
  • Het arrangement Save old buildings? h45 is gemaakt met Wikiwijs van Kennisnet. Wikiwijs is hét onderwijsplatform waar je leermiddelen zoekt, maakt en deelt.

    Auteur
    VO-content
    Laatst gewijzigd
    2021-06-16 12:41:09
    Licentie

    Dit lesmateriaal is gepubliceerd onder de Creative Commons Naamsvermelding-GelijkDelen 4.0 Internationale licentie. Dit houdt in dat je onder de voorwaarde van naamsvermelding en publicatie onder dezelfde licentie vrij bent om:

    • het werk te delen - te kopiëren, te verspreiden en door te geven via elk medium of bestandsformaat
    • het werk te bewerken - te remixen, te veranderen en afgeleide werken te maken
    • voor alle doeleinden, inclusief commerciële doeleinden.

    Meer informatie over de CC Naamsvermelding-GelijkDelen 4.0 Internationale licentie.

    Aanvullende informatie over dit lesmateriaal

    Van dit lesmateriaal is de volgende aanvullende informatie beschikbaar:

    Toelichting
    Deze les valt onder de arrangeerbare leerlijn van de Stercollectie voor Engels voor havo, leerjaar 4 en 5. Dit is thema 'Buildings'. Het onderwerp van deze les is: Save old buildings? In deze les gaat over redenen om wel of niet oude gebouwen redden. De grammaticaopdracht behandelt adverbs and adjectives.
    Leerniveau
    HAVO 4; HAVO 5;
    Leerinhoud en doelen
    Engels;
    Eindgebruiker
    leerling/student
    Moeilijkheidsgraad
    gemiddeld
    Studiebelasting
    4 uur en 0 minuten
    Trefwoorden
    adverbs and adjectives, arrangeerbaar, engels, h45, oude gebouwen, save old buildings?, stercollectie