Hoe proberen burgers en de overheid sociale segregatie en sociale polarisatie in de grote steden zoals New York, Washington en Los Angeles tegen te gaan?
Of anders gezegd: hoe probeert men van deze steden ‘melting pots’ te maken, terwijl ze nu nog veel weg hebben van ‘salad bowls’?
Lees de inleiding van de tekst ‘Desegregation Busing’.
Kijk naar de video 'How white flight really started'.
Burgers dragen zelf bij aan integratie. Tussen 1815 en de Amerikaanse Burgeroorlog (1861-1865) kwamen Europese migranten uit onder meer Ierland en Duitsland naar de Verenigde Staten. Het waren vaak redelijk bemiddelde mensen, met een goede opleiding, die van plan waren om in het land te blijven. Ze hadden weinig moeite om zich aan te passen en bij iedere generatie van nakomelingen werd de binding met het land van herkomst minder.
Lees de tekst 'What's behind the rise of interracial marriage in the US?.
What's behind the rise of interracial marriage in the US?Attitudes, migration patterns, availability of partners and education are all factors of interracial and interethnic marriages It’s been half a century since the US supreme court decriminalized interracial marriage. Since then, the share of interracial and interethnic marriages in America has increased fivefold, from 3% of all weddings in 1967 to 17% in 2015. The Loving v Virginia ruling was a clear civil rights victory, but as Anna Holmes reflects in a recent article for the New York Times, understanding who benefits from that win and how is a much more complicated story. For a start, there’s huge geographic variation in where intermarriage happens; it’s more common in metropolitan areas than rural places (18% compared to 11%) according to a Pew analysis of the Census Bureau’s figures. But those are just averages – US metropolitan areas vary significantly from Honolulu, Hawaii, where 42% of weddings are interracial to Jackson, Mississippi where the figure is just 3%. Overall, the most common type of intermarriage is between a partner who is white and one who is Hispanic of any race – those relationships accounted for 38% of all intermarriages in 2010. White-Asian couples accounted for another 14% of intermarriages, and white-black couples made up 8%. There are gender patterns in this data too. In 2008, 22% of black male newlyweds chose partners of another race, compared to just 9% of black female newlyweds. The gender pattern is the opposite among Asians. While 40% of Asian females married outside their race in 2008, just 20% of Asian male newlyweds did the same. For whites and Hispanics though, Pew found no gender differences. These numbers aren’t simply a matter of love. They’re the consequence of economic, political and cultural factors. To list just a few:
Source: The Gardin.com/lifeandstyle 2018. |