Teachers will use the rubric below to give feedback on your PF4.
Students can use the rubric below to see what teachers will look for in their work, and to do a self-check of their work.
Rubric Portfolio Assignment English
Year 3 Period 1 (& 2)
Names of students:
Criteria |
O |
|
N |
|
B |
Grammar Basic & advanced tenses Sentence structure |
Student often makes mistakes in basic tenses (Present/Past Simple. Noticeable mistakes in sentence structure. |
Many mistakes in tense use, but sometimes correct. Some mistakes in sentence structure. |
Student mostly uses correct tenses (Present/Past Simple, Continuous, Perfect). No mistakes in sentence structure. |
Uses tenses well, with few mistakes. Advance grammar or sentence structure used. |
No mistakes, tenses used correctly throughout all conversation. |
Vocabulary Theme related vocabulary Adjectives |
Limited vocabulary, basic words are repeated. Words are misused. No use of adjectives. |
Some topic-related words used, but lacks variety. Some mistake in word use. |
Uses interesting words and includes different spooky adjectives. No mistakes in word use. |
Uses a good variety of words related to the story topic. Including different spooky adjectives. |
Rich use of vocabulary, with many topic-specific words. Clever use of vocabulary. |
Use of English Pronunciation |
Spoken work is hard to understand. Not all group members speak. Accent interferes with communication. |
Can be understood, but there are many spelling or grammar mistakes. Strong accent. |
Mostly clear, with a few pronunciation errors. Noticeable accent, communication is not affected. |
Clear and easy to understand, only minor mistakes. Slight accent. |
Very clear, almost no mistakes in pronunciation. Great input from all group members. Near native sound. |
Creativity Story structure Character roles Narrative ending & perspective Irony Foreshadowing Editing |
No originality, few or no story telling elements. Story is predictable. No visible attempt at implementing new ideas. No edit VWO: No use of irony and/or foreshadowing |
Story structure is present but not fully developed. The plot is somewhat original but poorly executed. Editing interferes with the film. VWO: Poor use of irony and/or foreshadowing |
Logical story structure. Plot is original. Film shows clear effort. Editing is done with effort. VWO: Decent use of irony and/or foreshadowing |
Logical story structure & original plot. Good execution of a well thought-out plan. Editing is done decently and adds to the film. VWO: Clever use of irony and/or foreshadowing |
Great story with never seen before originality. Great use of foreshadowing, irony and editing. A real thriller. |
Assignment Completion & Process |
Instructions not followed correctly or missing important parts. Group work was inadequate. No use of feedback. Handed in after the deadline. |
Instructions followed but executed poorly. Small part missing. Poor group work. Ineffective use of feedback. |
Followed instructions and submitted both the skeleton and video. Group work was adequate. Visible use of feedback. Handed in on time. |
Followed instructions well; everything is included and on time. Group work was good. Feedback implemented. |
Perfect execution, all parts submitted on time and complete. Excellent group work. Great use of feedback. |
Required literary elements to discuss in your skeleton:
Structure of the short story
Setting
Narrative ending
Narrative perspective/point of view
Character roles
Irony*
Foreshadowing*
*only vwo
(Tip: describe your scary elements using lots of adjectives)
Good to know:
You don't have to use ALL the tenses that are listed under 'Grammar' in the rubric.
You do have to include ALL the required literary elements.
Please list your elements, and them describe them in full (English) sentences.