# References

Babiak, K., & Thibault, L. (2009). Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0899764008316054

Bekkers, R. (2010). An Introduction to the Study of Philanthropy. https://renebekkers.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/anintroduction_v5.pdf

Bekkers, R. (2013). De maatschappelijke betekenis van filantropie [The societal significance of philanthropy]. Inaugural lecture, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. https://renebekkers.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/bekkers_filantropie.pdf

Bekkers, R. (2016). Tools for the Evaluation of the Quality of Experimental Research. November 11, 2016. https://renebekkers.wordpress.com/2016/11/11/tools-for-the-evaluation-of-the-quality-of-experimental-research/

Bekkers, R. (2018). Values of Philanthropy. Keynote Address, ISTR Conference 2018, July 12, 2018, Amsterdam. https://renebekkers.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/values-of-philanthropy.pdf

Bekkers, R., De Wit, A. & Wiepking, P. (2017). Jubileumspecial: Twintig jaar Geven in Nederland. Pp. 61-94 in: Bekkers, R. Schuyt, T.N.M., & Gouwenberg, B.M. (Eds.). Geven in Nederland 2017: Giften, Sponsoring, Legaten en Vrijwilligerswerk. Amsterdam: Lenthe. https://renebekkers.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/bekkers_dewit_wiepking_17.pdf

Bekkers, R. & Schuyt, T.N.M. (2008). And Who is Your Neighbor? Explaining the Effect of Religion on Charitable Giving and Volunteering. Review of Religious Research, 50 (1): 74-96. https://renebekkers.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/bekkers_schuyt_rrr_08.pdf

Bekkers, R. & Verkaik, D. (2015). How to estimate what participation in third sector activities does for participants. Deliverable 3.2 of the project: “Impact of the Third Sector as Social Innovation” (ITSSOIN, 613177), European Commission – 7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research. http://itssoin.eu/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/ITSSOIN_D3_2_What-participation-does-for-participants.pdf

Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving part one: Religion, education, age and socialisation. Voluntary Sector Review, 2(3), 337-365.

Brembs, B. (2018). Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037

Brown, S. J., Goetzmann, W., Ibbotson, R. G., & Ross, S. A. (1992). Survivorship bias in performance studies. The Review of Financial Studies, 5(4), 553-580. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/5.4.553

Bryan, M.L. & Jenkins, S.P. (2016). Multilevel Modelling of Country Effects: A Cautionary Tale. European Sociological Review, 32 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv059

Campbell, D.E., & Yonish, S.J. (2003). Religion and Volunteering in America. Pp. 87-106 in C. Smidt (ed.) Religion as Social Capital. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.

Carlin, P. S. (2001). Evidence on the volunteer labor supply of married women. Southern Economic Journal, 67(4): 801-824.

Clarke, A., & Crane, A. (2018). Cross-sector partnerships for systemic change: Systematized literature review and agenda for further research. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3922-2

Clemens, M.A. (2017). The Meaning of Failed Replications: A Review and Proposal. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(1): 326-345.

Cochrane, J.H. (2005). Writing Tips for Ph. D. Students. http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john.cochrane/teaching/papers/phd_paper_writing.pdf

Connelly, B.S. & Chang, L. (2016). A Meta-Analytic Multitrait Multirater Separation of Substance and Style in Social Desirability Scales. Journal of Personality, 84: 319-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.1216

Cortina, J.M. (1993). What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 98-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24: 349–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0047358

De Vaus, D. (2001). Research Design in Social Research. London: Sage.

DeVaux, R.D., Velleman, P.F., & Bock, D.E. (2012). Stats: Data and Models. Third Edition. Boston: Pearson Education.

De Wit, A., Qu, E.H. & Bekkers, R. (2021). The health advantage of volunteers in Europe is larger for the elderly and the less healthy. https://osf.io/zqjnb/

Dillard, S. [JudgeDillard]. (2018, February 20). Before your final review, temporarily change the font on your brief (or opinion). You'll catch more typos and errors that way. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/JudgeDillard/status/966116574112468992

Eco, U. (2015[1977]). How to Write a Thesis. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Eidlin, F. (2011). The methods of problem versus the methods of topic. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44: 758-761. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001260

Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455

Fanelli, D. (2012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90: 891-904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192‐011‐0494‐7

Fang, F.C., Steen, R.G. & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. PNAS, 109: 17028-17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109

Firebaugh, G. (2008). Seven Rules for Social Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1086/20935

Gerring, J. & McDermott, R. (2007). An Experimental Template for Case Study Research. American Journal of Political Science, 51: 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00275.x

Goodman, S. (2008). A Dirty Dozen: Twelve P-Value Misconceptions. Seminars in Hematology, 45: 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2008.04.003

Gordon, B.R., Zettelmeyer, F., Bhargava, N. & Chapsky, D. (2017). A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3033144

Henrich, J., Heine, S.J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33: 61-135.

Helmig, B., Spraul, K. & Tremp, K. (2012). Replication Studies in Nonprofit Research: A Generalization and Extension of Findings Regarding the Media Publicity of Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3): 360–385.

Hofstadter, D.R. (1999). Gödel, Escher, Bach. Anniversary Edition: An Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books.

James III, R.N., & Jones, K.S. (2011). Tithing and religious charitable giving in America. Applied Economics, 43(19): 2441-2450.

Joinson, A. (1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(3), 433-438. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200723

Kelly, E. L., & Conley, J. J. (1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 27.

https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.27

Kerr, N.L. (1989). HARKing: Hypothesizing After Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2: 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1207%2Fs15327957pspr0203_4

King, G. [kinggary]. (2018, February 8). If you're picking a topic to write a paper about, ask yourself just one question: _whose mind are you going to change about what?_ Retrieved from https://twitter.com/kinggary/status/961636186761695234

KNAW, NFU, NWO, TO Federatie, Netherlands Association of Universities for Applied Sciences, & VSNU (2018). Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity 2018. https://www.vsnu.nl/files/documents/Netherlands%20Code%20of%20Conduct%20for%20Research%20Integrity%202018.pdf

Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 332-354. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0314

Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025-2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9

Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://psyarxiv.com/9d3yf/

Lelkes, Y., Krosnick, J. A., Marx, D. M., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2012). Complete anonymity compromises the accuracy of self-reports. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1291-1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.002

Locke, S. (2018). The Datasaurus data package.

https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/datasauRus/vignettes/Datasaurus.html

Maas, C.J.M. & Hox, J.J. (2005). Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling. Methodology, 1: 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86.

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E.D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Infometrics, 12 (4): 1160-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOI.2018.09.002

McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51: 882–888.

Meehl, P.E., & Hathaway, S.R. (1946). The K factor as a suppressor variable in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30: 525–564.

Menchik, P. L., & Weisbrod, B. A. (1987). Volunteer labor supply. Journal of Public Economics, 32(2), 159-183.

Neugeboren, R., & Jacobson, M. (2005). Writing Economics: A Guide for Harvard’s Sophomore Economics Concentrators. http://sites.fas.harvard.edu/~ec970bk/Writing_Economics/WritingEconomics.pdf

Nosek, B.A., et al., (2015). Promoting An Open Research Culture. Science, 348: 1422-1425. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6242/1422

Occamsbeard (2014). Bullshit Bingo. http://occamsbeard.com/bullshit-bingo/

Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science, 349. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716.full.html

Park, J.Z., & Smith, C. (2000). “To Whom Much Has Been Given”: Religious Capital and Community Voluntarism Among Churchgoing Protestants. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39: 272-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00023

Parry, H.J. & Crossley, H.M. (1950). Validity of response to survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 14: 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1086/266150

Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., & Costantini, G. (2018). A practical primer to power analysis for simple experimental designs. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1): 20, 1-23. http://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.181

Pierson, D.J. (2004). How to Write an Abstract That Will Be Accepted for Presentation. Respiratory Care, 49:1206-1212. http://www.rcjournal.com/contents/10.04/10.04.1206.pdf

Ratcliffe, S. (2012). Taking the Credit. http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2012/10/taking-the-credit/

Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners' personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.251

Rossi, P.H. (1987). The Iron Law of Evaluation and Other Metallic Rules. Research in Social Problems and Social Policy, 4: 3-28. https://www.gwern.net/docs/sociology/1987-rossi.pdf

Schönbrodt, F.D. & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5): 609-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009.

Seawright, J. & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research : A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61: 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077

Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849-873. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206305279601

Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D. & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Simmons, J.P., Nelson, L.D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22: 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632

Simons, D.J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, S.D. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630

Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L.D. & Simmons, J.P. (2014). P-Curve: A Key To The File Drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143: 534-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033242

Sociomama (February 8, 2018). Sociomama’s Checklist for Good Academic Writing (at least in Sociology).

https://sociomama.wordpress.com/2018/02/08/sociomamas-checklist-for-good-academic-writing-at-least-in-sociology/

Thomson, P. (2017). Avoiding the laundry list literature review. September 11, 2017. https://patthomson.net/2017/09/11/avoiding-the-laundry-list-literature-review/

Ultee, W., Arts, W. & Flap, H. (2009). Sociologie: Vragen, Uitspraken, Bevindingen. Groningen: Noordhoff.

Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self‐and partner‐ratings. Journal of Personality, 68(3), 413-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00102

Wiepking, P., & Bekkers, R. (2012). Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. Part Two: Gender, family composition and income. Voluntary Sector Review, 3(2), 217-245.

Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 215-240.

Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose Connections: Joining Together in America’s Fragmented Communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ziliak, S.T., & McCloskey, D. (2004). Size matters: the standard errors of regressions in the American Economic Review. Journal of Socio-Economics, 33: 527-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.024