Administrative information
|
Title
|
EU proposal of Regulation on AI - A case study |
 |
| Duration |
60 min |
| Module |
C |
| Lesson Type |
Interactive session |
| Focus |
Ethical - Compliance, Legality and Humanity |
| Topic |
EU and International Legislation/Frameworks on data, AI, human rights and equality |
Keywords
human-centred, risk-based approach, transparency, explainability, high-risk AI, conformity assessment,
Learning Goals
- Explore the impact of the proposed AI regulation on real-world scenarios.
- Gain insights into how this regulation might influence AI development, deployment, and oversight.
- Critically evaluate the proposed regulation's implications for the future of AI in Europe.
Expected Preparation
Learning Events to be Completed Before
Obligatory for Students
None.
Optional for Students
None.
References and background for students
None.
Recommended for Teachers
None.
Lesson materials
The materials of this learning event are available under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Instructions for Teachers
Agenda: Opening Remarks (5 minutes) Introduction to the importance of EU human rights legislation in safeguarding fundamental freedoms and values. Setting the stage for the case study analysis.
Case Study Presentation (5 minutes) Presenting a detailed case study that revolves around a human rights violation within the EU context. Providing background information on the case, parties involved, and the legal issues at stake.
Exploring Relevant EU legislation (5 minutes) Identifying and discussing key EU human rights legislation applicable to the case. Delving into relevant articles from the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights.
Legal Analysis and Discussion (20 minutes) Breaking down the legal arguments presented by each party in the case study. Facilitating a guided discussion on how EU human rights law applies to the specific circumstances of the case.
Group Presentations and Debate (15 minutes) Each group presents their arguments and engages in a structured debate. Moderated discussion to ensure focus on legal aspects and EU human rights principles.
Legal Precedents and Case Law (5 minutes) Exploring relevant legal precedents and case law that influence the case study's outcomes. Discussing how previous judgments contribute to shaping the interpretation of EU human rights law.
Wrap-up and Closing Remarks (5 minutes) Summarizing key insights gained from the case study analysis.
Outline
| Duration (min) |
Description |
| 5 |
Opening remarks |
| 5 |
Case Study Presentation |
| 25 |
Exploring relevant EU legislation; Legal analysis and discusson |
| 20 |
Group presentation and debate; Lgeal precedents and case law |
| 5 |
Closing remarks |
More information
Click here for an overview of all lesson plans of the master human centred AI
Please visit the home page of the consortium HCAIM
Acknowledgements
 |
The Human-Centered AI Masters programme was co-financed by the Connecting Europe Facility of the European Union Under Grant №CEF-TC-2020-1 Digital Skills 2020-EU-IA-0068.
The materials of this learning event are available under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
|
|
The HCAIM consortium consists of three excellence centres, three SMEs and four Universities
|
